Practices  |  Attorneys |  Offices |  Clients |  Careers |  Resources |  Contact | Articles and Publications  
  

Michael L. Amaro
Partner
Email: mamaro@prindlelaw.com

Michael L. Amaro is one of the founding partners of Prindle, Amaro, Goetz, Hillyard, Barnes and Reinholtz LLP (previously known as Prindle, Decker & Amaro LLP) and graduated seventh in his class from Southwestern University School of Law in 1983.  During law school, he spent two years on the Law Review Staff, authoring and editing articles for the school's Law Review Journal.  After graduating from law school, he spent six years at a mid-sized insurance defense firm in Los Angeles.  Since 1983, Mr. Amaro has developed a very diverse law practice with a broad client base.

One of his practice areas is the representation of clients involved in the amusement, sports, recreation, and leisure industries.  Such clients include carnivals, water parks, family fun centers, race and go-kart tracks, bowling centers, miniature golf facilities, circuses, white water rafting companies, ice and roller skating facilities, health and fitness clubs, equestrian facilities, outfitters and guides, and concert venues.  He has also defended a number of products liability cases involving jet skis, boats, sports and exercise equipment and pyrotechnic devices. Through Mr. Amaro, the firm is a member of the Roller Skating Association, the International Association of Amusement Parks & Attractions, the World Water park Association, and the National Association of Amusement Ride Safety Officials.

Mr. Amaro is also a founding member of International Amusement and Leisure Defense Association, a group of nationwide attorneys that are extensively involved in the representation of recreation and amusement industries. He is also one of the founding members, and currently on the board of directors of the National Restaurant and Retail Defense Association, serving the interests of the restaurant and and retail industries.

Mr. Amaro has a significant products liability and general casualty defense practice. He represents an impressive list of companies including Electrolux Home of Products, Frigidaire, Dometic, Origo, Lennox Home Products, Lennox Hearth
Products, Danaher, Atlas Copco, Wellcraft Marine Corporation, City of Long Beach, California State University system, and County of Los Angeles, Ross Stores, Target Stores, Farrell's Ice Cream Parlours, Sears Roebuck & Co., just to name a few. A sub-specialty within the products liability arena involves the defense of fire subrogation cases.

 

 

     
PRIOR FAVORABLE VERDICTS FOR MICHAEL L. AMARO
CASE COURT WHERE CASE TRIED VERDICT
California Capital Insurance Company v. Electrolux
Home Products, Inc., and Sears, Roebuck & Co.
San Bernadino Superior Court, case number CIVVS 900984 Defense
Restivo v Malibu Grand Prix LASC-Van Nuys, Case No. NWC27018 Defense
Barazza v Raging Water Pomona Municipal, Case No. 93C01675 Admitted Liability; all Plaintiff verdicts came in less than statutory offers to compromise. Verdicts of $1,000, $2,000 and $5,000 respectively
Kagan v Wild Rivers Orange County Sup. Court, Case No. 667851 Defense
Strauss v Malibu Grand Prix LASC-Van Nuys, Case No.NWC50852D Defense
Mendez v Paramount Pictures LASC-Central, Case No. BC014587 Defense
Mallard v Raging Waters Pomona Municipal, Case. No. 94C03012 Defense
Cabrera v Raging Waters LASC-Pomona, Case No. KC014409 Defense
Lewin v Family Fitness Harbor Municipal, Case No. 95C2415 Defense
Antman v Malibu Grand Prix LASC-Van Nuys, Case No. LC022199 Defense
Summers v Wild Rivers Orange County Sup. Court, Case No. 693621 Tried on liability only; Plaintiff found 90% at fault. Case settled thereafter
Gonzalez v Riach LASC-Central, Case No. BC024119 Defense
Rosales v Raging Waters Pomona Municipal, Case No. 95C04956 Defense
Nguyen v Raging Waters LASC-Pomona, Case No. KC020526 Defense
Slater v Wild Rivers Orange County Sup. Court, Case No. 761834 Admitted Liability; verdict came in less than statutory offer. Plaintiff had to pay costs and expert fees
Theiss v Family Fitness LASC-Van Nuys, Case No. LC021493 Defense
Foremost v Monaco LASC-San Fernando, Case No PC16036 Defense
Zahler v Wild Rivers Orange County Sup. Court, Case No. 793301 Defense
Bryan v Raging Waters Pomona Municipal, Case No. POM99C01540 Defense
Wrice v Bally Total Fitness LASC-Redondo, Case No. YC037378 Defense
Leffler v Raging Waters Pomona Municipal, Case No. 00C01175 Defense
Milov v Six Flags LASC-San Fernando, Case No. PC023790 Defense
Roberson v Six Flags LASC-San Fernando, Case No. PC024897 Defense
Hernandez v Bally LASC-Central, Case No. BC234998 Defense
Tran v Bally Orange County Sup. Court, Case No. 01CC04693 Defense
Jacob v Six Flags LASC-San Fernando, Case No. PC026028 Defense
Chavarria v Wild Rivers Orange County Superior Court Defense
Nitzani v Bally Los Angeles Superior Court Defense
Lynch v Wild Rivers Orange County Superior Court Defense
Grange v Electrolux Contra Costa Superior Court Defense
Steele v Wave House San Diego Superior Court Defense
Everett v Magic Mountain Los Angeles Superior Court Defense: as to one plaintiff, and $60,000 verdict for other plaintiff (verdict less than $200,000 statutory offer to compromise, and hence, net verdict of zero after costs awarded)
Cory Arias v. Wild Rivers OCSC/Case No. 04CC09463 Defense