Email: mamaro@prindlelaw.com
Michael L. Amaro is
one of the founding partners of Prindle, Amaro,
Goetz, Hillyard, Barnes and Reinholtz LLP (previously
known as Prindle, Decker & Amaro LLP) and graduated
seventh in his class from Southwestern University
School of Law in 1983. During law school, he
spent two years on the Law Review Staff, authoring
and editing articles for the school's Law Review
Journal. After graduating from law school,
he spent six years at a mid-sized insurance defense
firm in Los Angeles. Since 1983, Mr. Amaro
has developed a very diverse law practice with a
broad client base.
One of his practice
areas is the representation of clients involved in
the amusement, sports, recreation, and leisure industries. Such
clients include carnivals, water parks, family fun
centers, race and go-kart tracks, bowling centers,
miniature golf facilities, circuses, white water
rafting companies, ice and roller skating facilities,
health and fitness clubs, equestrian facilities,
outfitters and guides, and concert venues. He
has also defended a number of products liability
cases involving jet skis, boats, sports and exercise
equipment and pyrotechnic devices. Through Mr. Amaro,
the firm is a member of the Roller Skating Association,
the International Association of Amusement Parks & Attractions,
the World Water park Association, and the National
Association of Amusement Ride Safety Officials.
Mr. Amaro is also a founding
member of International
Amusement and Leisure Defense
Association, a group of
nationwide attorneys that are
extensively involved in the
representation of recreation and
amusement industries. He is
also one of the founding
members, and currently on the
board of directors of the
National Restaurant and Retail
Defense Association, serving the
interests of the restaurant and
and retail industries.
Mr. Amaro has a significant
products liability and general
casualty defense practice. He
represents an impressive list of
companies including Electrolux
Home of Products, Frigidaire,
Dometic, Origo, Lennox Home
Products, Lennox Hearth
Products, Danaher, Atlas Copco,
Wellcraft Marine Corporation,
City of Long Beach, California
State University system, and
County of Los Angeles, Ross
Stores, Target Stores, Farrell's
Ice Cream Parlours, Sears
Roebuck & Co., just to name a
few. A sub-specialty within the
products liability arena
involves the defense of fire
subrogation cases.
|
| |
|
|
| CASE |
COURT WHERE
CASE TRIED |
VERDICT |
California Capital Insurance Company v. Electrolux
Home Products, Inc., and Sears, Roebuck & Co. |
San Bernadino Superior Court, case number CIVVS 900984 |
Defense |
| Restivo
v Malibu Grand Prix |
LASC-Van
Nuys, Case No. NWC27018 |
Defense |
| Barazza
v Raging Water |
Pomona
Municipal, Case No. 93C01675 |
Admitted
Liability; all Plaintiff verdicts came in less than
statutory offers to compromise. Verdicts of $1,000,
$2,000 and $5,000 respectively |
| Kagan
v Wild Rivers |
Orange
County Sup. Court, Case No. 667851 |
Defense |
| Strauss
v Malibu Grand Prix |
LASC-Van
Nuys, Case No.NWC50852D |
Defense |
| Mendez
v Paramount Pictures |
LASC-Central,
Case No. BC014587 |
Defense |
| Mallard
v Raging Waters |
Pomona
Municipal, Case. No. 94C03012 |
Defense |
| Cabrera
v Raging Waters |
LASC-Pomona,
Case No. KC014409 |
Defense |
| Lewin
v Family Fitness |
Harbor
Municipal, Case No. 95C2415 |
Defense |
| Antman
v Malibu Grand Prix |
LASC-Van
Nuys, Case No. LC022199 |
Defense |
| Summers
v Wild Rivers |
Orange
County Sup. Court, Case No. 693621 |
Tried
on liability only; Plaintiff found 90% at fault. Case
settled thereafter |
| Gonzalez
v Riach |
LASC-Central,
Case No. BC024119 |
Defense |
| Rosales
v Raging Waters |
Pomona
Municipal, Case No. 95C04956 |
Defense |
| Nguyen
v Raging Waters |
LASC-Pomona,
Case No. KC020526 |
Defense |
| Slater
v Wild Rivers |
Orange
County Sup. Court, Case No. 761834 |
Admitted
Liability; verdict came in less than statutory offer.
Plaintiff had to pay costs and expert fees |
| Theiss
v Family Fitness |
LASC-Van
Nuys, Case No. LC021493 |
Defense |
| Foremost
v Monaco |
LASC-San
Fernando, Case No PC16036 |
Defense |
| Zahler
v Wild Rivers |
Orange
County Sup. Court, Case No. 793301 |
Defense |
| Bryan
v Raging Waters |
Pomona
Municipal, Case No. POM99C01540 |
Defense |
| Wrice
v Bally Total Fitness |
LASC-Redondo,
Case No. YC037378 |
Defense |
| Leffler
v Raging Waters |
Pomona
Municipal, Case No. 00C01175 |
Defense |
| Milov
v Six Flags |
LASC-San
Fernando, Case No. PC023790 |
Defense |
| Roberson
v Six Flags |
LASC-San
Fernando, Case No. PC024897 |
Defense |
| Hernandez
v Bally |
LASC-Central,
Case No. BC234998 |
Defense |
| Tran
v Bally |
Orange
County Sup. Court, Case No. 01CC04693 |
Defense |
| Jacob
v Six Flags |
LASC-San
Fernando, Case No. PC026028 |
Defense |
| Chavarria
v Wild Rivers |
Orange
County Superior Court |
Defense |
| Nitzani
v Bally |
Los
Angeles Superior Court |
Defense |
| Lynch
v Wild Rivers |
Orange
County Superior Court |
Defense |
| Grange
v Electrolux |
Contra
Costa Superior Court |
Defense |
| Steele
v Wave House |
San
Diego Superior Court |
Defense |
| Everett
v Magic Mountain |
Los
Angeles Superior Court |
Defense:
as to one plaintiff, and $60,000 verdict for other
plaintiff (verdict less than $200,000 statutory offer
to compromise, and hence, net verdict of zero after
costs awarded) |
| Cory
Arias v. Wild Rivers |
OCSC/Case
No. 04CC09463 |
Defense |